← Back to the beginning of Genesis 38
Ver. 12. The daughter of Shuah, &c.] This was just in God upon Judah, for his fraudulent dealing with Tamar; whom he neither married to his son Shelah, nor suffered to be married to another. Sin is oft punished in kind.
Ver. 13. To shear his sheep.] And so to put by his sorrow, as Jonathan did his anger, by going into the field to shoot. At sheep shearings they had feasts. (1 Samuel 25:8,11)
Ver. 14. Covered her with a vail.] As they that do evil shun the light. She was going about a deed of darkness. For she saw that Shelah was grown.] She ran into this foul sin, partly for revenge, and partly for issue. But this excuseth her not: for the revenge she took was private; and she should have sought a godly seed by lawful wedlock, and not by abominable incest. Discontent is the mother of much mischief; as it was in Judas, Haman, &c.
Ver. 15. He thought her to be an harlot.] Because she sat in an open place: first, In bivio, saith Junius, where there is liberty of looking every way; the guise and garb of harlots. (Proverbs 7:12,9:14 Ezekiel 16:24,25) Next, she sat covered: whores were not altogether so shameless then as now: they shun not to be seen with bold and bare faces, breasts, and wrists. Such a sight may soon inflame a Judah; nay, occasion a Job to break his covenant. (Job 31:1) The ivy bush showeth there is wine within: which, though no evil follow upon it; yet the party shall be damned, saith Jerome, because she offered poison to others, though none would drink it. See Isaiah 3:16. Because she had covered her face.] Some read, Because she had coloured or painted her face. But that he knew her not by her voice one would wonder. Surely, he was so set upon the satisfying of his lust that he minded nothing else. Lust is blind; “and if the blind lead the blind,” &c. Hosea 2:2 -“Let her take away her fornication from her face, and her adultery from between her breasts”; laid out, and painted, or patched.
Ver. 16. Let me come in unto thee.] This is recorded, (1.) To cut the comb of those proud Jews, that glory so much of their pedigree, and name of Judah. How could they say, “We be not born of fornication?” (John 8:41) (2.) To mind us that there is no Church to be found on earth without blot and blemish. (3.) That we may consider and admire the utter abasement of our Lord Christ, who would be born, not only of holy, but of impure parentage. And this, to show, 1. That he borrowed no grace or glory from his progenitors, and as he needed not to be ennobled, so neither was he disparaged by them; 2. That by his purity and passion all our sins are expiated and done away; like as the sun cleareth whatsoever filth is found in the air or on the earth. Three women only are mentioned in his genealogy; Rahab the harlot, Bathsheba the adulteress, and this incestuous Tamar; (Matthew 1:3,5,6) to show his readiness to receive the most notorious offenders, that come unto him with bleeding and believing hearts. (1 Timothy 1:15)
Ver. 17. Wilt thou give me.] The love of money breeds noisome lusts. (1 Timothy 6:9) Harlots are sordida poscinummia, as Plautus hath it.
Ver. 18. And he gave it her, and came in unto her.] He gave her whatsoever she desired; as the manner of such men is: and although he committed incest ignorantly, yet not through ignorance, but through heat of lust, which is brutish and boisterous, burning as an oven: whence the Greeks have named it: and Plato compares it to a headstrong horse. ’ Επιθυμια απο του θυμιεν ardere. Plato appetitum assimilat equo, qui sit, σκολιος, κρατεραυχων, Βραχυτραχηλος, μελαγχρως, κωφος, μαντιγι μογις υτεικων.
Ver. 20. By the hand of hls friend.] His broker. Fie upon such Adullamites! Such coal carriers as this, saith one, be good to scour a hot oven with. Such another was Jonadab to Amnon. How much better that heathen, that answered, Amicus tibi sum, sed usque ad aras.
Ver. 21. Where is the harlot?] The holy whore, as the Hebrew word importeth; such as committed that filthiness, under a pretence of holiness. Such, among the heathens, were the lewd worshippers of Priapus (this is thought to be Baalpeor); and Venus at Cyprus; where the maids, in honour of their goddess, prostituted their chastity to all that would, once a year. So in their Lupercals and Bacchanals at Rome, in quibus discurrebatur ad publicos concubitus, for like reason. Of such unclean persons, even by God’s house, we read in 2 Kings 23:7, and of such as “sacrificed with harlots” in Hosea 4:14, who brought their hire for a vow; called therefore, the price of a salt bitch (dog). (Deuteronomy 23:17,18) Vah propudium!
Ver. 22. There was no harlot in this place.] Few places can say so. Every house in Egypt had a dead corpse in it; and too many houses here have such, as, “living in pleasure, are dead while they live.” (1 Timothy 5:6) Of this sort was that Arlet, a skinner’s daughter in Normandy, whose nimbleness in her dance made Duke Robert enamoured, &c. On her he begat our William the Conqueror. In spite to whom, and disgrace to his mother, the English called all whores, harlets. But who can read without detestation, that in Rome a Jewess may not be admitted into the stews, unless she will be first baptized? as Espencaeus, an honest Papist, complains. Sane, hercle, homo voluptati obsequens fuit dum vixit. -Terent. Heyl., Geog., p. 96. Espencae., De Continentia, lib. iii. cap. 4.
Ver. 23. Lest we be shamed.] His care was more to shun shame, than sin. How much better that heathen! Satis nobis persuasum esse debet, &c.; this we should be fully persuaded of, saith he, that although we could conceal the matter from all, both gods and men, yet we should do nothing covetously, nothing unjustly, nothing against chastity, or common honesty. Though I were sure, saith another philosopher, that all men would be ignorant of what evil I do, and that all the gods would forgive it me; yet, for the filthiness that is in sin, I would not commit it. Plato condemns the poets for saying, that it were no matter though men did commit sin, so they could hide it. Si non caste, saltem caute. How much better the Christian poet! Turpe quid acturus, te, sine teste, time. “Wherefore hast thou despised the commandment of the Lord, to do evil in his sight,” though none else saw thee? said God to David. (2 Samuel 12:9) And David, in his sorrowful confession, saith as much to God upon the matter; “Against thee, thee only, have I sinned”; viz., in respect of the secrecy of my sin; therefore it is added, “and done this evil in thy sight.” (Psalms 51:4) Behold, I sent this kid, &c.] He comforts himself in the loss of his pledge, that yet he had been as good as his word: but not a word we hear of sorrow for his sin; which, if he can but keep secret, he rests secure. This is a piece of natural atheism; and it is general. Nihil tamen avare, nihil iniuste, nihil libidinose, nihil incontinenter esse faciendum. -Cicero Offic. Si scirem homines ignoraturos, et Deos ignoscituros, tamen propter peccati turpitudinem peccare non vellem. -Sen. Ως λυσιτελει το αδικειν εαν λανθανη. — -Auson. Quasi dicat, Ego steti promissis, hoc mihi sufficit.
Ver. 24. Bring her forth, and let her be burnt.] He was willing to be rid of her, for fear of losing his son Shelah, and therefore passeth a precipitate and savage sentence, to burn a great-bellied woman; which the very heathens condemned as a cruelty, in Claudius. Howbeit there are that take these to be his words, not as a judge in the cause, but as an accuser. “Bring her forth,” sc., into the gates, before the judges; and let her be burnt if found guilty, according to the custom of the country. We read not of any that were, by God’s law, to be burnt with fire, but the high priest’s daughter only, for adultery. (Leviticus 21:9) Hence the Hebrews say, that this Tamar was Melchizedek the high priest’s daughter. But it is more likely she was a Canaanitish proselyte. Let us beware of that sin, for which so peculiar a plague was appointed, and by very heathens executed. See Jeremiah 29:22,23. Dio, lib. lvii. Verba Iudae de vivicomburio Thamarae, non sunt Iudicis, sed Accusatoris. -Alsted.
Ver. 25. By the man, whose these are, &c.] So his secret sin comes to light. All will out at length, though never so studiously concealed. (Matthew 10:26) “That which hath wings shall tell the matter.” (Ecclesiastes 10:20) It was a quill, a piece of a wing, that discovered the Gun Powder Plot. Discern, I pray thee, whose are these.] So, when we come to God, though he seem never so angry and ill set against us, can we but present unto him ourselves his own; our prayer, Mediator, arguments, all his; and then say, as she here to Judah, “Whose are these?” he cannot deny himself. Ut taceant homines iumenta loquentur. — - Juven.
Ver. 26. She hath been more righteous than I.] A free confession, joined with confusion of his sin; for he knew her no more. This was, to “confess and forsake sin,” as Solomon hath it. (Proverbs 28:13) Not like that of Saul; “I have sinned, yet honour me before the people”: (1 Samuel 15:30) or that of those in the wilderness; “We have sinned; we will go up”: they might as well have said, We have sinned, we will sin. (Deuteronomy 1:41) The worser sort of Papists will say, When we have sinned, we must confess; and when we have confessed, we must sin again, that we may also confess again, and make work for new indulgences and jubilees; making account of confessing, as drunkards do of vomiting. But true confession goes along with hatred, care, apology. Sandys’s Relation of West. Relig., sec. 8.
Ver. 27. Behold, twins were in her womb.] Betokening two peoples pertaining to Christ. The Jews first put forth their hand, as it were, willing to be justified by their works, and to regenerate themselves. For this, they were bound with a scarlet thread—condemned by the law: wherefore, pulling back their hand, they fell from God. Then came forth Pharez, the breach-maker, that is, the violent and valiant Gentiles; who took the first birthright and kingdom by force: who when they are fully born, then shall the Jews come forth again. (Romans 11:11,25,26) And that this is not far off, hear what a worthy divine, yet living, saith: In Daniel 12:11 we have a prophecy of the final restoration of the Jews, and the time is expressed, which is 1290 years after the ceasing of the daily sacrifice, and the setting up of the abomination of desolation, which is conceived to be in Julian’s time; who did essay to rebuild the Temple of the Jews, which was an abomination to God; who therefore destroyed it by fire out of the earth, tearing up the very foundation thereof, to the nethermost stone. This was Anno Dom. 360, to which if you add 1290 years, it will pitch this calculation upon the year 1650. Before this, Babylon must down, &c. Mr Case’s God’s Wait. to be Grac., p. 58.