testament and the new; which is able sufficiently to instruct thee in all
things needful to thy salvation, and to the attainment of the kingdom of heaven. To the which I beseech the Almighty Father of heaven, of his infinite mercy and goodness, and by the merits of his only Son, our Saviour and Redeemer, Jesus Christ, through his Holy Spirit in us, bring us all. Amen. Finis
[[ Builded upon, Orig. ed. [ Qualmire, Orig. ed.; i. e. quagmire.]
[a Collection of Tenets Extracted from the Canon Law, Shewing the Extravagant Pretensions of the Church of Rome!]
Dist. 22. Omnes”. De Major. et obedient.: Solite?. — Extrav. De majorit. et obedient.:
7» Unam. sanctam^
Hx that knowledgeth not himself to be under the bishop of Rome, and that the Hist bishop of Rome is ordained by God to have primacy over all the world, is an heretic, Book and cannot be saved, nor is not of the flock of Christ.
Dist. 10. De sententia. excommunicationis: Noverit”. 25. q. 1: Omne”.
Princes laws, if they be against the canons and decrees of the bishop of Rome, be of no force nor strength.
Dist. 19. 20. 24. 9. 1l. A recta; Memor; Quoties; Hoc est’. 25. q. 1.
Generali; Violatores”
All the decrees of the bishop of Rome ought to be kept perpetually of every man, without any repugnance, as God’s word spoken by the mouth of Peter; and whosoever [! In reference to these extracts from the Canon, arguments. He must have already availed himself Law, Strype says: ‘” And one of the first things of them, when, in stating to the king his unwillingwherein he (i. e. Cranmer) shewed his good service ness to accept the see of Canterbury, he disclosed to the church was done in the parliament, in the therewithal the intolerable usurpation of the pope of latter end of this year, 1533. When the supremacy Rome. See his Examination before Brokes. And came under debate, and the usurped power of the he frequently recurs to them in his subsequent bishop of Rome was propounded, then the old col- writings, particularly in the Answer to the Devon-lections of the archbishop did him good service; shire Rebels, a. p. 1549, and in his long Letter to for the chief, and in a manner the whole burden of queen Mary, in September, A.D. 1555.” See Dr this weighty cause was laid upon his shoulders.” Jenkyns’ Remains of Abp. Cranmer, Vol. II. p. 1.] Strype, Memorials of Abp. Cranmer, Vol. I. p. 32. [? Corpus Juris Canonici. Ed. Paris. 1687. Ed. Oxon. 1840. Burnet places the passing of the Decret. i. Pars, Dist. 22. can. i. «Omnes. Tom. act, containing some former acts for revising the I. p. 29.] Canon Law,” &c. in the year 1544, and says that [? Id. Decretal. Gregor. IX. Lib. 1. Tit. xxxiii. Cranmer pressed this often with great vehemence, De majorit. et obedient. cap. vi. Solite.” Tom. II. and, to shew the necessity of it, drew out a short p. ὅ9.] extract of some passages in the Canon Law,” which [ Id. Extravag. Comm. Lib. 1. Tit. viii. De he gives in the Collection of Records.” The majorit. et obedient. cap. i. Unam sanctam.’ text follows that of Burnet’s History of the Reforma- Tom. II. p. 394.]
[tion, but it is corrected in many places by the [5 Id. Decret. i. Pars, Dist. 10. Tom. I. p. 8.]]
[MS. in the Library of Corpus Christi College, [$ Id. Decretal. Gregor. IX. Lib. v. Tit. 39.]
[Cambridge. Dr Jenkyns suggests that «the old De sentent. excommunicat. cap. xlix. Noverit.”]
[collections,” mentioned by Strype, are probably Tom. II. p. 276.]]
[those which are still preserved at Lambeth under [7 Id. Decret. ii. Pars, Causa xxv. Quest. 1.]
[the title of Archbishop Cranmer’s Collection of can. viii, Omne.” Tom. I. p. 345.]]
[Laws, and that they were formed, perhaps, while [? Id. Decret. i. Pars, Dist. 19. Tom. I. p. 23.]
[he resided at Cambridge, and consist of a large etsqq.]]
[number of passages, extracted at length from the [? Id. ibid. Dist. 20. Tom. I. p. 26.]]
[canon law, and followed by that short summary of [15 Id. Decret. ii. Pars, Causa xxiv. Quast. 1.]
[some of its most remarkable doctrines which is here can. ix. A recta, can. x. ‘ Memor.” can. xii.]
[printed. They were doubtless of great use,” he Quoties.’ can. xiv. Hac est.” Tom. I. p. 332.]]
[goes on to say, “in the discussions alluded to by [! Id. ibid. Causa xxv. Quast. 1. cap. xi.]
[Strype; but that was not the only nor the first oc- Generali, can. v. Violatores.’ Tom. I. p. 345.]]
[casion, in which they supplied the archbishop with ’]
doth not receive them, neither availeth them the catholic faith, nor the four evangelists; but they blaspheme the Holy Ghost, and shall have no forgiveness.