PAGE 2
9 Corpus Gratiani; Lucas Antonius de Giunta Florentinus Venitiis impressit; anno salutis; M.D. XIIII. die XX. Maii. Leone Decimo Pontifice Maximo Sanctissimoque, et Venetiis Leonardo Lauretano Serenissimo Principe; fol. ccccccxi. (Unless otherwise stated, all references to a Corpus will refer to this Corpus.)
12 Ibid; fol. ccccccxx Ibid; fol. ccccccxvi.
18 Ibid; fol. ccccccxvii.
21 Corpus Gratiani; Friedburg, C. I. C., Book I. Tit. I.
PAGE 4
2 Ibid.
PAGE 8
11 “An ostensive conception indicates how an object is constituted.” Fleming’s Vocabulary of Philosophy.
PAGE 10
8 Emphasized by Plotimus; Plotini Ennead, IV., 2, I: ὅτι ὅλη ἐν πᾶσι, καὶ ἐν ὅτῳ οὖν αὐτοῦ ὅλη.
PAGE 12
14 Occam repeatedly takes refuge in the arbitrary and inscrutable power of God.
PAGE 34
7 Aristotelis Phisica; Lib. I. Cap. II.
PAGE 36
29 Occam’s Nominalism,—Suppositio, “The word, or term never did and never could adequately express the thought, but it might be supposed to do so, and, whenever the supposition was made, the term might be used on all occasions and in every way for the thought… . A universal was made to stand instead of, and was used instead of, the reality which it adequately expressed.” Prof. J. M. Lindsay, William Occam and His Connection with the Reformation; British Quarterly Review, July, 1872.
Aristotelis Posteriora, Lib., I. Cap. IV.: Quid universaliter decimus, determinemus.
PAGE 46
6 Aristotelis Posteriora; Lib. I. Cap. IV. Aristotelis Stagiritae, Philosophorum Omnium facile Principis: Opera quae quidem extant omnia. Lodovici Viris Valentini, de libris Aristotelicis censura.
De Vita Aristotelis digne genere philosophiae, ac scriptis eiusdem, per Philippum Melanchthonem; Basileae, 1538.
16 Aristotelis Praedicamenta; Cap. VI., De Quantitate.
21 Aristotelis Phisica; Lib. I., Cap. II.
25 Aristotelis Phisica; Lib. IV., Cap. I.
PAGE 48
1 Aristotelis Phisica; Lib. II.; Lib. VI., Cap. I.: Si autem ea continua sunt, ut antea definivimus, quorum ultima sunt unum, ea tangentia quorum fines sunt simul.
8 Aristotelis Phisica; Lib. VI., Cap. I.
14 Aristotelis Phisica; Lib. VI., Cap. I.: Si linea quidem continuum punctum autem indivisibile sit.
16 Ibid: Impossibile est ex indivisibilibus continuum quicquam constare, ut ex punctis lineam.
19 Ibid: Cum igitur indivisibile partibus careat, totum ipsum tangat necesse est.
PAGE 50
3 The following arguments are based upon Aristotle’s Phisica, which is commented upon by Ockham in his Summulae in Lib. Phisicorum.
PAGE 62
16 Phisica; Lib. I., Cap. I., et II.
PAGE 70
26 Phisica; Lib. I., Cap. II., De Substantia.
PAGE 72
6 Praedicamenta; Cap. V., De Substantia: Praeterea primae substantiae ideo quod aliis omnibus subiiciuntur, et omnia alia de ipsis vel praedicantur, vel in ipsis sunt, ea gratia primae substantiae maxime dicuntur. Secundae vero substantiae, species hac, in quibus quas imprimis substantias appellabamus, insunt, dicuntur.
Merito igitur post primas substantias, solae aliorum omnium species generaque secundae substantiae dicuntur.
8 Aristotelis Metaphisica; Lib. VII., Cap. X., XI., XVI.: Quod igitur nec earum quicquam, quae universalia dicuntur, substantia sit, nec ulla sit substantia ex substantiis patet; also, Posteriora; Lib. I., Cap. IV.
21 Praedicamenta; Cap. VI., De Quantitate: Linea vero continuum est, sumi namque communis terminus, quo partes lineae copulentur, punctum potest; itidem ut superficiei linea; ff.