[oT MESE E US NS a fe ROT SUE Rm REN ER. το MORE en ER d Sen gira EPA] Ws EC SERA ii PRIA TNT Wg on Loss S CE A 1 I SIM ALS RARI. Pru D iE Ray E Ae. M LUA S aa Re Aw ΔῈ ^ ba ς Feel ς si ra ARR TE iy A aL ) GR TENN i PILE RATS Say - LEMÓ- rubo act TOO YA ILS EE oe EI SS Beater Ἐν RS a ar RN ἐπ τ’]
Eur Ens
(een d E,? us x ALLEM p LE ET E. eMe OE ta no E REN RI d VES NA
ER zu τοῖν ἐς WO S Sd Mk Tid MN Τ Nec. ΩΝ ES MA LS aU fn MER ve DOS VLC AME” rapi sun SURE Ei o ER E D. x
i AN AES pn FR: i Ἀ wA UU sm m a 1j en SE ES ST A qos Wo Te ὦ TENG UL ean LE EST
ui um aras Ba RI E CU. E d Ne e V ST VES TN ” MESES S en es NE e (E em 5 τ ers ΠΝ LE 1 PN Se an AE ducem. Ut i ^ En M rs x CES oh ὸ EE AE E ERR ay αν ἘῚ Ν SL Ae ty τ ee TMS ἈΠῸ Y Eee ELO NA A hi A Ἐν UNE Sire
M γο, INE. a CERRAR C C o ENARRARE COT NL d vhs nee IO VPE pO smi CR RN ys T - ANA: A^ o ΤΑ. SUM NS df aA ΓΕ BA Te Ld Sm i RS RR we REN o v WERE RS e ut ne Oo 600 a Co ER MO ^ ’ Ν FEES AE m AIO EI pcm “AME A ον ia d. rt ATOMS. MA e ue QUO DURER, nce Tw ENERO EI. E LES D. L ΣΦ I LS MN ENG Mor SE. d. Co DEZ d ἢ AM A AER 4 KENT QUII TOY kg ” ol DAS LEAL 3 3 ORE HGS ane Ὧν; s EE ue Rs e ANS e s. τὴ A à la τὸ SR ROS coL ER LE τς DS T C WR TSR We Re ἘΝ Μ EE TY a HE a M UN “i “A a ”; “ἢ, x NEL γ. AN U M IU. ua hams Sad Ea SOAR ee MAU e Mr ἂψ e I EON d dies ow A ^ Ven ” ” AA aia SE Egan τὰς ^ie MP vi LM IS TR x Fdo ane a bh No ral Mare Xx REM; By CHA RM S P? ^ esr dE ded. AS ον WT EP. E oed US Mese S Sr NICO CM ἐπ ἐν Η͂Σ - ] m ^ NIC ὦ e ECL ὧ cc tea E Mts SY Cada Make VRAT. Con Wo CIR RR NA AN Net 2.: m MEE S ΤΕ m i “iR ” d. P “ns T: E (EA t “d “o 1 νι oc SUN i: i Pv M LS ” i it x cy Mm eM iau 1 M « 1 TE UM ff ν αν TE Um i e: AER aes Η 7 \ ὰ) MN. qt TN AM Ls ” TRIS e: L ἩΜΩ͂Ν Ν 1 d et Aie d STE b TTE ” e E mm. Tee = ” TUM x AUR TON ^ f ” x RE, ig, od! Tost A IS uo ALIM OH μη ν ΔΎ ρει ν TZ E TERS t WT Ww YES MA UT ν ΕἾ, Ἐν τ νὰ CERT Tati AR UE Ἦ iti ἃ = $ e n Ἢ di EN? MT nemi PO a «out at ” ^ VN SEE Ke d: AUI, EA ON EE Td E LS ys “E Mut E: T ais wl TT - ρε. Ὁ ” un “S E is e ANS A e 1 “M; Lei A ds Lucr a μ” ^ hs E Π. 5 at ἢ Ton Hr L “en es e” d RE Min uM TL o EC MM IM hd ἂ 3 sdb. ER ^ EY IE ot vc DP NEW T ^ Smp mc 1 Ear T.’ of ky “sl S NS τες AE IRC UR a a Se πο} ANE LE om die A Κ͂Τ P Ka TA: LP JO, PC τ E b Uy “ETE ΟΝ d ἀπῇ ἐν
[ΕΝ i V0 ἘΝ AM ρ e MEE 0p eR LH BRE n vios Vg]
[net D, APA M Ty DAN Sr th 7 Pe Ros Mad a NE MS rrr bL Eme.]
[n NE To NL e ar ΟΣ er att EE Mito E > et Mats M ME EI WE. en E p PME]
[LS P EE: RR Ny A i tL ὭΣ]
[c ks era VEDO, a PER Ee Mte e CLUB Em T “eben ann ἘΣ ἐπ ΓΕ EK ΤΣ ΤΟΝ τ; gei e]
[DECRETA {ng bes sc AE A UC P M ME p t p δῇ peru. ri E 4 S i ei RN A »]
[POE EU MAT p med ior LINT Sis ἊΣ Aes Crop TS P E ΡΣ SEO T REP RS UT;]
[Hu gat 6 pues ter Ph ARN qs GE lv TP CEDE fds Εν τα Al ASTER eat A SL) 1]
[Py Eu p ru Cn C Bg To de i0 2 1073 NE Du. acc E j]
How Thomas Cranmer, Archbishop, Bishop Ridley, And
Latimer, Were Sent Down to Oxford to Dispute, with the Order and Manner, and All Other Circumstances, unto the Said Disputation, and Also to Their Condemnation, Appertaining
[This Disputation is found in Foxe’s Acts and Monuments, and is extracted from Ed. 1583,
1428, sqq
Anour the tenth of April, Cranmer archbishop of Canterbury, Ridley bishop of
London, and Hugh Latimer bishop also sometime of Worcester, were conveyed as prisoners from the Tower to Windsor; and after, from thence to the university of Oxford, there to dispute with the divines and learned men of both the universities, Oxford and Cambridge, about the presence, substance, and sacrifice of the sacrament. The names of the university doctors and graduates appointed to dispute against them were these: of Oxford, Doctor Weston, prolocutor, Doctor Tresham, Doctor Cole, Doctor Oglethorpe, Doctor Pie, Master Harpsfield, Master Fecknam: of Cambridge, Doctor Yong, vice-chancellor, Doctor Glin, Doctor Seaton, Doctor Watson, Doctor Sedgewicke, Doctor Atkinson, &c. The articles or questions whereupon they should dispute were these:
I. Whether the natural body of Christ be really in the sacrament after the words spoken by the priest, or no?
II. Whether in the sacrament, after the words of consecration, any other substance do remain, than the substance of the body and blood of Christ?
III. Whether in the mass be a sacrifice propitiatory for the sins of the quick and the dead?
On Saturday, being the 14th of April, at eight of the clock, the aforesaid vice-chancellor of Cambridge, with the other doctors of the same university, repaired to Lincoln college again, and found the prolocutor above in a chapel, with the company of the house, singing Requiem mass, and tarried there until the end. Then they, consulting all together in the master’s lodging, about nine of the clock came all to the university church called St Mary’s; and there, after a short consultation in a chapel, the vice-chancellor, the prolocutor, &c. of Oxford, caused the vice-chancellor of Cambridge, and the rest of the doctors of that university, to send for their scarlet robes, brought from Cambridge; save that doctors Seton and Watson borrowed of the Oxford men. And in this time,.the regents in the congregation-house had granted all the Cambridge doctors their graces, to be incorporate there; and so they went up, and were admitted immediately. Doctor Oglethorpe presenting them, and the proctor reading the statute, and giving them their oaths.
That done, they came all into the quire, and there held the convocation of the university. They had mass of the Holy Ghost solemnly sung in prick-song by the quire-men of Christ’s church. But first, the cause of the convocation was opened in English, partly by the vice-chancellor, and partly by the prolocutor, declaring that they were sent by the queen, and wherefore they were sent; and caused master Say, the register, openly to read the commission. That done, the vice-chancellor read Cambridge letters openly, and then concluded, that three notaries, master Say for the convocation, a beadle ef Cambridge for that university, and one master White for Oxford, should testify of their doing; and then willed the said notaries to provide parchment, that the whole
Bh. ον -
publicarum, tam ethnicorum quam Christianorum; i.e., “the preserver of all commonwealths, as well of the heathen as of the Christians:” and so he dilated the matter with one or two stories of the Romans commonwealth. Which thing when he had done, he said that he was very glad to come to an unity, so that it were in Christ, and agreeable to his holy word.
When he had thus spoken his full mind, the prolocutor caused the articles’ to be read unto him, and asked if he would grant and subscribe unto them. Then the bishop of Canterbury did read them over three or four times, and touching the first article, he asked what they meant by these terms, Verum. et naturale; i.e. “true and natural.” “Do you not mean,” saith he, “corpus orgamicum; i.e. a sensible body?” Some answered, Idem quod matum est ex virgine; i.e. “the same that was born of the virgin;” and so confusedly some said one thing, some another. Then the bishop of The article Canterbury denied it utterly: and when he had looked upon the other two, he said they archbishop. “were all false, and against God’s holy word; and therefore he would not agree, he said, Scarborough in that unity with them. Which done, the prolocutor, first willing him to write his warning:;;; ΩΝ mind of them that night, said moreover, that he should dispute in them, and caused a dispute. copy of the articles to be delivered him, assigning him to answer thereunto on Monday next; and so charged the mayor with him again, to be had to Bocardo, where he was
[[! The following are the articles: panis et vini, neque alia ulla substantia, nisi subl. In sacramento altaris, virtute verbi Domini stantia Christi, Dei et hominis. a sacerdote prolati, presens est realiter sub speciebus 3. In missa est vivificum ecclesie sacrificium panis et vini naturale corpus Christi conceptum de pro peccatis tam vivorum quam mortuorum propivirgine Maria: item, naturalis ejusdem sanguis. tiabile. Harl. MSS. 3642.] 2. Post consecrationem non remanet substantia]
kept before; offering moreover unto him to name what books he would occupy, and. should have them brought unto him. The archbishop was greatly commended of every body for his modesty; insomuch that some masters of art were seen to weep for him, which in judgment were contrary to him.